data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1722/f1722ed79315d42d50551fee44f7c9cd5f4ae691" alt="Replacing macbook pro mid 2010 ram"
replacing the DVD drive with a second disk) bear in mind that the two SATA ports are of different speeds in the mid-2010 MBP. One final point, if using a data-doubler or similar (i.e. And unless you're doing some heavy video editing or really disk-heavy work, I'd suggest the performance differences won't be noticed. Sure it was nice having ~400MB/s+ (not sure what speed it actually ran at) but I didn't do a lot of work that truly utilised the top-speed of the SSD, so the performance differences were pretty moot. For me, the top-end drive speed difference didn't mean all that much, because primarily I was after the low seek speeds.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a92c7/a92c705ad1eac8d22091c25b6f1fb5ec3db00f33" alt="replacing macbook pro mid 2010 ram replacing macbook pro mid 2010 ram":max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/Kingston_KVR16LS11-8-5a8df3d7d8fdd50037998ffe.jpg)
I also found some vendors saying that (at the time) the Intel 330s were seeing less RAs than some other similarly priced brands I was looking at this may or may not be the case right now, and I was only able to compare a few brands. I found people saying they'd successfully used the Intels (and well most brands actually). Personally I looked around for info on the most reliable SSDs rather than the fastest. It worked for me, and it's TRIM compatible but you need to use TRIM Enabler or similar to turn it on.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0de0/e0de0407499064df4023086427a68541c1d7bdf6" alt="replacing macbook pro mid 2010 ram replacing macbook pro mid 2010 ram"
The performance difference (compared to stock 500GB HDD) was amazing. I put an Intel 330 series SSD in my mid-2010 MBP.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1722/f1722ed79315d42d50551fee44f7c9cd5f4ae691" alt="Replacing macbook pro mid 2010 ram"